Computed Tomography (CT) Automatic Exposure Controls (AEC) Testing Protocol Using a CelT Phantom


Journal of medical physics and applied sciences is an international peer reviwed journal aiming to publish the most relevant and recent research works across the world. Medical Physicists will contribute to maintaining and improving the quality, safety and cost-effectiveness of healthcare services through patient-oriented activities requiring expert action, involvement or advice regarding the specification, selection, acceptance testing, commissioning, quality assurance/control and optimised clinical use of medical devices and regarding patient risks and protection from associated physical agents (e.g. x-rays, electromagnetic fields, laser light, radionuclides) including the prevention of unintended or accidental exposures; all activities will be based on current best evidence or own scientific research when the available evidence is not sufficient. Medical physics is also called biomedical physics, medical biophysics or applied physics in medicine is, generally speaking, the application of physics concepts, theories and methods to medicine or healthcare.

We are sharing one of the most cited article from our journal. Article entitled “Computed Tomography (CT) Automatic Exposure Controls (AEC) Testing Protocol Using a CelT Phantom” was well written by Dr. Keolathile Diteko.


The purpose of this research was to set-up a protocol for using the CeIT elliptical test phantom to test the performance of Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) systems on the CT scanners in use at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI).  These are the GE Lightspeed, GE Optima 6600 and Siemens Somaton Definition in Radiology and the Philips Brilliance in Radiotherapy treatment planning. The variation of image noise and the tube current-time product (mAs) were studied from images obtained from each scanner. Noise was measured using the standard deviation of five selected regions of interest in the images of the phantom obtained from the CT scanners. Normalised percentage noise (noise %) was then calculated to compare how the scanners dealt with image noise with relation to the mAs. The results showed an increase in mAs values (increase in dose) with the phantom and regulation of the noise leading to acquisition of quality images from all three scanners. Off-centering, using the AP scout increased the dose to the phantom when the patient table was above the isocenter and reduced the dose to the phantom when the table was below the isocenter. This shows the importance of patient centering for effective AEC system’s dose regulation.  Different SPRs also affected the operations of the AEC systems differently, with PA giving more dose followed by LAT and AP in the GE and Philips scanners which were studied on this aspect. The Philips D-DOM modulation kept almost constant dose across the scanning process regardless of the phantom size, hence D-DOM should be used with care. CeLT phantom was useful in studying dose regulation by different AEC systems, hence it is useful in quality control (QC) tests of AEC systems on CT scanners as a testing protocol was formulated from this study.

Here is the link to view complete article:

Authors are welcome to submit their manuscripts. Submit manuscript at (or) as an e-mail attachment to or

Media contact

Eliza Miller

Managing Editor

Journal of Medical Physics and Applied Sciences